Singularity – my final film at University of Brighton

This blog details the development and making of my film Singularity, which I made for my Major Project in my third year of the BA (Hons) Moving Image course at University of Brighton.

Advertisements

Mythopoesis: MA Photography show at University of Brighton

image

In the foyer outside the cafe at University of Brighton (Grand Parade site) is a car. It’s rear doors are open, inviting you to clamber inside and sit on the old leather seat. As photos of this car scroll across the small screen in the place where the rear view mirror normally is, you can let the old car smell accompany your mind to the car’s past. It’s a vivid way of allowing an object’s past to present itself.

image

The MA Photography show ends on Friday 19 September 2014.

Sound and vision: Not Punch and Judy: The Chronicle and Story of an Experiment in Emergent Practice

The editing process of the song the puppets sing at the end of the film took longer than I anticipated and there wasn’t time to edit in the animation I’d made previously. This bugged me over the weekend so I began editing it in on Monday and finished today; I took the finished film to the installation and swapped it.

I enjoyed finding and applying noises for the petals closing and opening. I decided to make the adult male’s voice a violin and the adult female’s voice a washing machine – this refers back to the Homemaking and Unmaking module in Semester 1 where the woman’s place is in the home and the man is free to go into the public arena; I sat on the kitchen floor and recorded myself playing the violin to the sound of the washing machine. I really enjoyed this and got lost in responding to the sound of the washing machine; several minutes of sound was recorded although only a few seconds were used in the film.

During the filmmaking process I identified three books that I knew, consciously, would affect the film. I’m going to discuss them here to see whether, and how, they influenced me.

As the boy puppet comes to life and sees and hears the adults arguing, he hums the tune to Lean on Me. He approaches them, after falling out of his flower pot, and persuades them to sing with him by humming the tune. The female joins in and helps to persuade the male. I think this could relate to Jung’s idea of his soul being feminine or childlike, taken from The Red Book, although this was not a conscious reference at the time of making. The male represents the rigid, closed mind – the ‘spirit of the times’ in Jung’s language – and the child represents a disregard for the current rules and a sense of freedom to be however he wishes from moment to moment – the ‘spirit of the depths’ in Jung’s language. However, the child is singing Lean on Me, which is a song I tend to sing when I’m drunk as a way of feeling united with others when they join in with me; in the film the child is trying to get the adults to stop arguing by singing with him under the premise that they’ll feel happier and, therefore, be nicer to each other. I suppose, then, that I’m acting out something from childhood: trying to change history by uniting the parents instead of watching them fight and feeling powerless. Jung’s ‘spirit of the depths’ or ‘soul’ does not have intentions; it is what it is in the moment and that could be perceived as good or bad but the point is, in Jung’s mind, to accept everything about it. The child’s actions, then, are about feeling powerful; the child does not accept the adults’ behaviours and tries to enforce his own beliefs on them.

Carolyn Abbate’s theory from her book Unsung Voices: Opera and Musical Narrative in the Nineteenth Century uses the relationship between storyteller and listener to define narrative voice in music. Narrative voice is heard in the dissonance between the ideas being shown in the content and something else, some unconscious, unstated idea or emotion that is heard rather than identified – the quality of the sound, rather than the meaning is picked up on. The voice over in my film is soft, intimate and slow; the visual track is mostly speeded up, which gives a sense of agitation. The voice is talking about bodies and memories, then the effect of authority figures on self belief, then questioning the process of believing the authority figure leading to questioning art and then, finally, coming back to a love of making figures and giving them voices. The voice over does not sound joyful, however; there is dissonance between the apparent love of drawing figures and giving them voices in childhood and the actual process of making the puppets. There is an emotional catch in the voice at 3:20 where I’m telling myself to take “very small steps” so there is some content there that is not shared with the viewer but is discernible; the content could relate to the feelings associated with ‘not good enough’ which the voice over will go on to talk about, or it could relate to the fear of working from a basis of emergent practice which means anything could emerge (what is lurking in the ‘spirit of the depths’ that might make an appearance?), or it could be something else entirely. Therefore, the emotional break in the voice presents us with the narrative voice of the film.

In Damaged Identities, Narrative Repair by Hilde Lindemann Nelson the idea of not accepting the traditional stories that affect identity is put forward; instead, supported by likeminded people by conversing about the damage construed by these stories, a person creates a new narrative that offers options for new, healthier, behaviours. Personal identity is like a story: it is depictive, selective, interpretive and connective, whereas a chronicle is factual and records what happens over time. Therefore, a person can choose which bits to depict, select, interpret and connect. This choice can be conscious or subconscious. In choosing to unite the adults through song, rather than have them fight psychopathically, I critiqued the domestic abuse depicted in Punch and Judy shows; I wanted to show conflict resolution although, I realise now, conflict resolution is about each individual taking responsibility for their feelings and actions, rather than trying to enforce a ‘wholesome’ idea onto those around them.

Public Information Films from the 1970s and 80s: controlling with mis-advice

Video

Delivered in an authoritative voice that didn’t invite criticism of the ridiculously nonsensical panic-inducing paradigm, they were all about putting the responsibility of a potentially harmful situation onto one person (the mother, or the child, or the car driver depending on which scenario they were trying to control).

In “Public information film – children must not be let out of doors alone…”, for example, the mother is diagnosed as at fault, despite the fact that several people are involved. If the cars parked on the street weren’t there, the boy would have clearly seen the car driver. If the car driver had been alert, he would have seen the boy run from the house to the road and could have slowed right down. If the mum and dad had valued their child’s intelligence they could have had a conversation with him about the dangers of parked cars and moving cars and asked him to use his initiative instead of mollycoddling him and making every decision for him, thus turning him into a rule following zombie.

Rant over.

Summer goals

image

This is a photograph of the result of a day spent in quiet reflection and planning. The larger titles are the labels of goals I have set for myself; the smaller ones are milestones within the goals. The sheet of landscape paper at the bottom is a calendar with daily tasks related to the goals printed on it. After reflecting on the two days accomplishing daily tasks I realise I haven’t given myself time off and I’m going to revisit the daily task sheet to build in days with no tasks scheduled. Afterall, there’s something lovely about having a day, now and then, with no plans and letting the day unfold.

Photos taken at Kensington Gardens

image

Rock on Top of Another Rock (2010/13) by Swiss artistsFischli/Weiss Serpentine Gallery

image

Rock on Top of Another Rock (2010/13) by Swiss artistsFischli/Weiss - close up, Serpentine Gallery

image

Gnarly tree in Kensington Gardens

image

Patterned fence at Albert Memorial

image

Albert Memorial silhouette

image

Seagulls on the Serpentine

image

Peter Pan statue

image

Peter Pan statue

image

Detail of Peter Pan statue

image

Detail of Peter Pan statue

image

Detail of Peter Pan statue

Fictions brief: journal

Matthew said: moving around the existing footage of my previous film is editing, not recomposing. So what is deconstructing? Maybe I do mean decompose rather than deconstruct in relation to working on my last film. Maybe I need to project it digitally whilst filming it in 16mm and bury it and dig it up and then see what I’ve got (burying it was Matthew’s idea). Seems very simple. Could also paint on the film. I like this idea. Could I make it into a shorter film? One reel? I said, in class today, I need to break it. I need to break it. Perhaps I need to film from Alice stopping dancing to the tunnel, then the alcove, then the sea. Part of the opening scene too. I need to see how long those bits are and record the timings. It might actually be quite complicated. Or I could just turn up and do it. What do I need to do for this? How is this decomposing it? I need to break it. How? Smash it. Kick it. Spit on it. Stab it. Slash it. Write on it. It’s over he’s dead. So I need to know how long a reel of film is and how long the bits are that I want to put on it. I need to touch it and I want to develop the image over the optical sound track. And I want it printed.